Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, 506(II) IPC and Section 67 IT Act Set Aside.

The case involves two appeals against conviction for gang rape and other offences. The prosecution alleged that on 16 May 2011, the appellants and thr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Mahadeo Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for the murder of his brother-in-law, Ravikiran, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Shaikh Mustafa, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Chunni, by setting her on fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence fails as prosecution unable to prove motive or establish chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Janabai, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of her daughter-in-law Meerabai and sentenced to life imprisonment. The pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Goa Children's Act, 2003 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Devilal Kurmi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa at Panaji for offences under Sections 2(y)(i) and 2(y)(ii) pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Injuries Were Not Life-Threatening and No Intent to Kill Was Established.

The appellant, Kishor s/o Parasram Kosre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Mayur Mulji Parmar and Bharat Mulji Parmar, were convicted by the Sessions Court, Mumbai, for the murder of an unknown woman and for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, Acquits Fourth Accused Due to Lack of Evidence. Common Intention Established for Assault and Murder, but Acquittal of One Accused Maintained as No Overt Act Proved.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.352 of 2007 filed by original accused Nos.1 to 3 (Balgonda Daulata Patil, Vidyyasagar @ Chotya Balgo...