COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018
18 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "income below taxable limit"
56 result(s) found
Found 56 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in KVAT Act Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside for Invalid Service of Notice. Service of notice under Section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be on the dealer or its authorized representative; service on an unauthorized employee is invalid.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, Dish TV India Limited (formerly M/s ASC Enterprises Ltd.), filed a revision petition under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.
9 Mar 2021The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Carrying Cost in Change in Law Claims Under PPA — Restitutionary Principle Upheld. Article 13.2 of Power Purchase Agreement Entitles Generating Company to Carrying Cost from Date of Change in Law Till Approval.
25 Feb 2019The case involves appeals by Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (Haryana Discoms) and Gujarat Urja Vika...
- 371
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Revenue Appeal in Service Tax Exemption Case Based on Policy Decision to Reduce Litigation. Department permitted to withdraw appeal against assessee's claim for exemption under Notification No. 13/2003-ST for sugarcane harvesting and transport services.
15 Jun 2017The Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Nashik II Commissionerate filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Will Probate in Succession Act Case — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact by Courts Below. The court upheld the validity of a Will executed by an 85-year-old testator, finding that the propounder had dispelled suspicious circumstances by examining attesting witnesses and the scribe under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, who were the original defendants in a probate proceeding, challenged the grant of probate of a Will executed by the testator, Smt. In...
- 68
