Search Results for "forest trees"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest established by contemporaneous correspondence; limitation does not bar refund of illegal exaction.

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest does not attract limitation and refund cannot be denied on unjust enrichment when payment was made under compulsion.

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SDO Order Remanding Sawmill Fine Case for Fresh Panchnama. Tahsildar's fine for illegal timber possession set aside due to lack of proper enquiry and violation of natural justice.

The petitioner, Vasant Govind Rajguru, a sawmill owner in Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, challenged the order dated 05.01.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation Order in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner's Wood Seized Without Proper Notice Under Section 61A of Indian Forest Act, 1927. Confiscation Proceedings Initiated Without Affording Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Namdeo Narayan Dekate, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of an order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Forest Vehicle Confiscation Case for Fresh Consideration — Appellate Court Failed to Apply Burden of Proof Under Section 61B of Indian Forest Act. Owner's claim of due diligence not properly scrutinized; matter remanded for fresh decision.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the Authorized Officer/Assistant Conservator of Forest and others against the judgment of the Adho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced to Rs.66 per Square Metre for Konkan Railway Project. Comparable Sale Deeds of Nearby Land at Rs.64 and Rs.66 per Square Metre Form Basis for Valuation Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case arises from the acquisition of 23,900 square metres of land belonging to the appellant, Smt. Shrimati Vishwanath Acharya (since deceased, rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wagers Challenging Termination by Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. — Petitioners Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by daily wagers (Kisan Atmaram Kasti, Hari Shravan Randive, Manohar Shripat Sakharkar, and Yogeshwa...