Search Results for "foreign detention"

213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Preventive detention set aside as criminal activities did not disturb public order, only law and order.

The petitioner, Sangita Nandu Toradmal, mother of the detenue Sanket @ Khoonkhar Dadya Nandu Toradmal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Material. Detenu's Dismissal from CISF for Alleged Smuggling Involvement Not Considered, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Avatar Meena, father-in-law of the detenu Muralilal Meena, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 August 2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 10 Months Between Release on Bail and Detention Order Held to Snap Live Link, Vitiating Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA, 1974.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Shyam Dharmadas Amlani, challenged the detention order dated 15th October 2005 passed by the State Government under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Abdulla Gulam Mustafa, challenged a detention order dated 27.11.2003 issued by the Principal Secretary (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Communication of Co-detenu's Revocation to Advisory Board. Failure to Forward Revocation Order and Representation to Advisory Board Before Considering Detenu's Case Vitiated Detention Order.

The petitioner, Ramesh Singh, a friend of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 3rd October 2003 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...