Search Results for "enforceable right"

56 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 56 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Bank of India's Appeal Against High Court Order Setting Aside Salary Revision for Officer Posted Abroad. Contractual Clause Permitting Revision of Salary Upheld as Binding Under Section 18 of State Bank of India Act, 1955.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India and others against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The respondent, Ravind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Pension Dispute with Institute Employees — State Not Liable for Pension Payments Under Institute's Self-Funded Scheme. Board Resolution Explicitly Stated No Separate Grant Would Be Sought from Government for Retirement Benefits.

The present appeal arises from a dispute between the State of Bihar and employees of the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna, re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...