Search Results for "empty formality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "empty formality"

544 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 17 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 Ousting Confirmation Requirement is Retrospective — Reference for Confirmation of Dissolution Decree Renders Infructuous. The amendment deleting the requirement of High Court confirmation of dissolution decrees applies to pending matters, making the reference infructuous.

9 May 2014

The case involves a First Appeal and a Reference arising from a matrimonial dispute under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The appellant, Sou. Kamal w/o ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Partition Action Under Section 54 CPC — Execution of Decree Not Dependent on Final Decree for Collector's Precept. The court held that the Collector can effect partition without a final decree, and the petitioners had opportunity to be heard.

10 May 2024

The case involves a decree-holder (sister) who obtained a preliminary decree for partition of her parents' property in 2006, which was confirmed in ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC — Non-joinder of Necessary Parties Not a Ground to Refuse Withdrawal. The court held that the trial court erred in rejecting the withdrawal application on the ground that the defect of non-joinder could be cured by amendment, as the plaintiff has a right to withdraw the suit under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.

15 Feb 2022

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in a civil suit (R.C.S. No. 144 of 2008) filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs), sought to w...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Batch of Income Tax Appeals Filed by Revenue — Court Notes Service of Notices and Delay in Filing of Appeals. Proceedings Adjourned; Interim Applications Pending.

26 Nov 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Co-operative Society for Lack of Notice Under Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court Holds That Civil Suit Is Barred by Sections 91 and 163 of the Act as Disputes Relate to Society's Internal Management.

5 May 2011

The plaintiffs, B.Y. Chavan and another, filed a suit against the Association of Tenants of the Bombay Catholic Housing Society and others, seeking re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Independent Application of Mind. Notices Based Solely on CIB Information Without Forming Reason to Believe Are Invalid.

1 Mar 2024

The petitioner, a Chartered Accountant, filed returns of income for Assessment Years 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, which were processed under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Adverse Orders in Service Matters — Held That Committee Must Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Passing Adverse Orders.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, employees of the Postal Department, filed writ petitions challenging adverse orders passed by the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate ...

High Court

Court Overturns MSETCL's Debarment of BNC Power Projects Limited. Arbitrary and retrospective application of debarment policy deemed unreasonable by the court.

28 Jun 2024

The Respondent ignored their own letter dated 13th August 2020, granting explicit permission to Sai Hotline to sublet work to the Petitioner. This con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)