Search Results for "detention order challenge"

636 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 636 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Consideration of Bail Orders. Detaining Authority's Failure to Interact with Witnesses and Consider Bail Orders Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Suraj @ Lalla Kalicharan Thakur, through his father, challenged the legality of a detention order dated 20/10/2022 passed by the Distr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Court holds that the alleged offences do not affect public order and the delay vitiates the detention order.

The petitioner, mother of the detenue, challenged a detention order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Suo Motu Directions on Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Goa. The Court directed the State to consider establishing detention centres for overstaying foreign nationals and upheld the validity of FIR against a Nigerian national for overstay under the Foreigners Act, 1946.

The Bombay High Court at Goa, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa. The matter origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines for Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Suo Motu Writ Petition. Court directs State of Goa to establish detention centres and formulate standard operating procedures for handling foreign nationals who overstay their visas.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa, arising from a criminal writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detenu Granted Bail in One Case and Remanded in Another, Yet Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Likelihood of Release and Continued Dangerous Activity.

The petitioner, Mohammed Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Shaikh @ Mohd. Asif @ Mental Abdul Sattar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Nephew of detenu successfully challenged preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA on grounds of procedural irregularities and lack of material evidence.

The petitioner, nephew of the detenu Salma Karolia, challenged a detention order dated 30th September 2014 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Lack of Proximity Between Alleged Acts and Public Order. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 fails as alleged criminal acts do not affect public order but merely law and order.

The case involves three criminal writ petitions filed by Sayyed Muddasir Hussain and Sayyed Izaj Hussain challenging their preventive detention orders...