KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "demand notices"
1658 result(s) found
Found 1658 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.
13 Dec 2024The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...
- 612
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging MMRDA’s Demand for Additional Premium under Lease Deed — Interpretation of Time Extension Clauses and Effect of Interim Court Orders on Construction Deadlines
8 Apr 2026The Petitioner No.1, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, successfully bid for a plot in Bandra-Kurla Complex leased by the Mumbai Me...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in Maize Import License Dispute — Actual User Condition Not Violated. Petitioner Trading House Allowed to Import Maize Through Canalizing Agency Without Being Actual User Under Foreign Trade Policy.
21 May 2021The petitioner, Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Pvt. Ltd., a trading house incorporated in 1919 and engaged in export of rice, oil seed, food grains and puls...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.
11 Mar 2010The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notices for Transfer Premium in Lease Assignment Case. Co-operative Society's Assignment of Lease to Members Does Not Attract Transfer Premium Under MCGM Policy.
25 Feb 2015The petitioners, Homi Villa Co-operative Housing Society Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...
- 271
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Case Due to Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Direction to Furnish Document — Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Directing Supply of Letter Dated 20.01.2001 Was Final and Could Not Be Modified Without Proper Justification.
25 Apr 2024The appellant, a manufacturer of cotton yarn and polyester yarn, was issued two show cause notices dated 11.05.2001 and 02.11.2001 alleging excess sto...
- 369
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Detention orders under Section 129 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 quashed for violating natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given and orders were unreasoned.
27 Jan 2026The petitioner, Bharat Co Operative Bank Mumbai Ltd, filed two writ petitions challenging detention orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State ...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Oil Corporation in Octroi Abolition Case. Octroi Demands and Seizure of Depots Quashed as Municipal Council Lacked Authority After 1999 Amendment to Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.
18 Jun 2026The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Excise Demand for Short Lifting of Liquor — Rule 14(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian & Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 Not Applicable to CL-9 Licensees. Demand notice of Rs.7,73,010/- set aside as Rule 14(2) applies only to licensees with minimum guarantee quantity, not to CL-9 licensees.
27 Jun 2017The petitioner, Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant, a CL-9 licensee under the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian & Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, was aggrieved by...
- 53
