Search Results for "delay penalty"

1477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for delay in handing over possession and interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, BASF India Ltd., entered into an agreement dated 5.3.2002 with the respondent, Landcom Properties Pvt. Ltd., under which the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal, Upholds Dismissal of Postal Assistant in NSC Commission Fraud Case. Non-Supply of Documents and Delay Do Not Vitiate Disciplinary Proceedings Without Demonstrated Prejudice.

The respondent, Udai Bhan Singh, was appointed as a Postal Assistant in 1978. A charge-sheet was issued on 31 August 1988 alleging that between 15 Jul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Refusal to Stay Redemption Fine. Holds that Customs Tribunal Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Redemption Fine Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962, as Section 129E Does Not Apply.

The appellant, Mydream Properties Private Limited, imported a yacht and VSAT equipment, against which the Commissioner of Customs passed an order-in-o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Appellants, Setting Aside High Court Order Imposing Penalty Liability on Insurance Company Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 -- Employer Solely Liable for Penalty Under Section 4A(3)(b) as Per Ved Prakash Garg Judgment

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by Appellants, challenging the Delhi High Court's order that imposed liability for penalty under Section 4A(3)(b)...