Search Results for "consumption otherwise"

698 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 698 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Online Liquor Delivery Platform in Excise License Dispute. The court held that the petitioner's order processing and delivery services do not amount to 'sale' under the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and quashed the Excise Commissioner's letter demanding a license.

The petitioner, Hip Bar Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, offering a semi-closed prepaid payment instrument (mobile ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BEST's Disconnection Order for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Electricity Consumer Entitled to Hearing Before Disconnection for Alleged Theft Under Section 163 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioner, M/s Neel Kamal Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, challenged an order dated 20th June 2001 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Food Safety Authority’s Advisories Allegedly Amending Regulations Without Statutory Power. Validity of Advisory Issued Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Questioned as Ultra Vires Section 92 of the Act.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited and the Indian Drug Manufacturers’ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute: Oxygen Used in Steel Manufacturing Held Not 'Raw Material' for Concessional Tax Rate. Court Restores Assessment Order Levying 3% Tax on Oxygen Sold to Tata Steel Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bihar Finance Act, 1981.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had held that o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Criminal Applications to Quash Process in Food Adulteration Prosecution. Vicarious Liability of Company Directors Under Prevention of Food and Adulteration Act Examined in Light of Nomination Under Rule 12-B and Factory-Specific Nature of Such Nomination.

The dispute arose from two criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by Bharat Puri and others, including ...