Search Results for "consolidated instructions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "consolidated instructions"

256 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

15 May 2025

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Quashing of General Court Martial Against Retired Army Officer in Procurement Irregularities Case. No Prima Facie Case Made Out as Evidence Lacked Intent to Defraud and Actions Were Within Authority's Discretion.

27 Nov 2019

The Union of India appealed against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, which quashed the order convening a General...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Relied on Irrelevant Grounds, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

28 Jan 2016

The Bombay High Court delivered a common judgment in two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writs of habeas c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Revenue Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Mutation Entry Validity. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that the Civil Court's decree regarding possession was binding on revenue authorities.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a land dispute between the petitioners (legal heirs of Dattu Appa Patil) and respondent 3 (Rama Yesaba Patil) over mutation entries ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)