Search Results for "confiscation"

285 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows State's Revision and Restores Confiscation of Kerosene Under Essential Commodities Act. Appellate Court Cannot Substitute Its Own Satisfaction for That of Confiscating Authority Under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

The State of Gujarat filed a criminal revision application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (correspond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes Customs' Seizure of Gold Chain, Orders Refund of Rs. 35,00,000 to Petitioner. Misapplication of Baggage Rules and Unjust Penalty Overturned; Personal Effects Defined and Upheld

The court reviewed the case of a petitioner whose gold chain with pendant was seized by Customs on allegations of smuggling. The petitioner argued tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in Excise Act Case — Confiscation of Vehicle Set Aside for Lack of Notice to Owner. Appellate Court's Order Upheld as Principles of Natural Justice Require Notice Before Confiscation Under Karnataka Excise Act, 1965.

The State of Karnataka filed a revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 454 Cr.P.C. — Sets Aside Confiscation of Rs. 25 Lakhs Deposited by Witness. Confiscation Order Held Without Authority of Law as Money Was Deposited Under Mistaken Order, Not as Fine or Penalty.

The appellant, Shamshad Ahamed, was a witness (PW-122) in a criminal trial (S.C. No. 430 of 2002) involving 33 accused charged with various offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Remands Forest Vehicle Confiscation Case for Fresh Consideration — Appellate Court Failed to Apply Burden of Proof Under Section 61B of Indian Forest Act. Owner's claim of due diligence not properly scrutinized; matter remanded for fresh decision.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the Authorized Officer/Assistant Conservator of Forest and others against the judgment of the Adho...