Search Results for "complaint filing place"

4006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes MMDR Act Proceedings Initiated by Police in Multiple Petitions; Police Not Authorized Under Section 22 of MMDR Act. Cognizance of Offences Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Cannot Be Taken on Police Report—Only Authorized Persons Can File Complaint.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench heard a batch of twelve criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Family Members in Dowry Case for Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Amendment. Magistrate failed to hold mandatory enquiry under amended Section 202 CrPC before issuing process against accused residing outside jurisdiction.

The petitioners, who are the husband, father, mother, brothers, and sister-in-law of the complainant-wife, challenged the order dated 14.8.2008 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Quashing of FIR in EPF Dues Under-Assessment Case — Court Examines Scope of Power Under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC, Citing R.P. Kapur and Bhajan Lal Precedents

The petitioner, a Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, had passed an assessment order under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Office-Bearers of Cooperative Housing Society; Holds Absence of Prima Facie Case Under SC/ST Act and MCOCA for Civil Dispute

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three proceedings: Criminal Application No.4144 of 2009, Criminal Application No.3304 of 2010, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications Seeking Police Investigation Against Former Mayor and Town Planner in Compensation Dispute. Court Holds That No Cognizable Offence Is Made Out and That the Magistrate's Direction to Treat the Application as a Complaint Was Proper.

The applicant, Atul Ashok Mundada, purchased two agricultural lands in Jalgaon for development. He claimed that the lands were acquired by the Jalgaon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Criminal Complaint in Partnership Dispute Due to Settlement of First Complaint — Principle of Constructive Res Judicata Under Section 300 CrPC Applied. Second Complaint on Same Cause of Action Held Not Maintainable as Abuse of Process of Court.

The petitioners, Kamlesh and Ankur Mehta, and respondent no.2, Rajanand Sarde, entered into a partnership on 29th January 2004 to manufacture self-net...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...