Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act from District Court to High Court for Consolidated Hearing. Transfer Ordered Under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Arbitration Matters.

The applicant, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...