Search Results for "capitalization"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "capitalization"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected from 15 to 18 Based on Age of Injured Claimant. The Court held that for a claimant aged 36 years, the appropriate multiplier is 18, and future prospects of 40% must be added for self-employed persons under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Feb 2023

The appellant, Vinod Babu M, aged 36 years, a self-employed person, sustained grievous injuries in a motor vehicle accident on 19.04.2009 involving tw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.1,20,000 per Acre. Comparable Sale Deed Method Upheld but Deduction for Development Reduced from 40% to 20% Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Apr 2019

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) against the judgment of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Multiplier and Conventional Heads. Deceased aged 52, multiplier of 13 applied instead of 11, and amounts under loss of consortium, loss of estate, and funeral expenses increased as per Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi.

5 Oct 2017

The appellants, widow and children of deceased Jugalkishore Bajaj, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reduces Compensation from Rs.4,640 to Rs.260 per sq.mtr. Based on Prior Agreement and Possession Delivery Before Notification. The court held that when possession is delivered and price agreed before Section 4(1) notification, the acquisition is not under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the claimant is not entitled to enhanced compensation.

3 Aug 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and award of the 3rd Joint Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Akola in L.A.C. No. 80/1998 dated 02/02/2011, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant Claimant Granted Enhanced Compensation for Land, Well, and Fruit Bearing Trees. Market Value of Land Enhanced to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

12 Jun 2017

The appellant, Abdul Hamid, was the owner of land bearing S.No.495 admeasuring 3.0 hectare at Mouza Deoli, District Wardha, which was acquired by the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Dependents of Deceased Cleaners in Workmen's Compensation Cases. Computation of monthly wages corrected to maximum under Section 4(1)(a) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1926, leading to enhanced awards.

3 Jun 2016

The judgment pertains to multiple appeals filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1926, against the order dated 28-04-2009 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in MIDC Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 3,00,000 per Hectare Based on Government Ready Reckoner. Claimants' Cross-Objection for Further Enhancement Rejected as Stamp Duty Valuation Not Conclusive for Market Value Under Section 34 of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961.

21 Nov 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a judgment of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

25 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Claim for Capital Gains Treatment in Partnership Dissolution Case. Gains from Sale of Land Held as Co-owned Personal Asset Not Business Income Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

12 Sep 2014

The case involved an income tax reference under Section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1988-89. The assessee, an individual ...

4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)