Search Results for "borrowing department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "borrowing department"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

High Court

High Court Grants Interim Relief to Advertisement Agency in Arbitration Dispute Over Hoarding Construction Agreement. The court found a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Adtrack Media LLP, an advertisement agency, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Leave Encashment Case for Re-employed Government Servant. Re-employed Employee Entitled to Second Leave Encashment Under Rule 36 of Sikkim Government Services (Leave) Rules, 1982, as Rule 32 Creates Legal Fiction Treating Re-employment as Fresh Service Entry.

23 Apr 2025

The dispute originated from the State of Sikkim's appeal against High Court orders that granted leave encashment benefits to a re-employed government ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Reopening of Assessments Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion and Non-Disclosure of Material Facts Held Invalid. The court held that reassessment notices issued without tangible material and based on a change of opinion are invalid, and that the assessee's failure to disclose primary facts is a prerequisite for invoking the proviso to Section 147.

19 Jan 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by corporate assessees challenging the reopening of their income tax assessments for the assessment ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Destruction of Evidence in Brutal Killing of Mentally Challenged Victim. Life Imprisonment and Fine Affirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including DNA, Recovery of Weapon, and Motive of Insurance Fraud.

25 Jan 2019

The appellant, Janardhan Kokre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, South Goa, for the murder of Dilip Sadashiv Naik, a mentally challenged person, u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Held Efficacious. Petitioners Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for Relief Against Recovery Actions.

9 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by borrowers (Arun Dattatraya Narake and others) against the Authorized Officer of Kolhapur Dist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

20 Feb 2015

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

25 Mar 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against ord...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)