Search Results for "bona fide purchasers"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Alternative Decree for Damages. Plaintiff's claim for specific performance of flat agreement dismissed due to subsequent sale to bona fide purchaser; alternative decree for damages against original vendor confirmed.

The judgment arises from two appeals against a common decree dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in Suit No.1642 of 1984. The original pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Refund of Earnest Money with Interest Upheld. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Y.V. Aparna, filed a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property against the respondents. The trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Cause of Action Disclosed. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the claim may ultimately fail on merits.

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by defendant No.1 in a suit for specific performance. The defendant sought rejection of the plaint u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC as Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence and Held Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Family Property.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Obstructionists in Execution Proceedings — Purchasers During Pendency of Lis Not Bona Fide. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applies to Execution Proceedings, and Purchasers During Pendency Are Bound by Decree.

The case involves three second appeals arising from execution proceedings. The respondent decree holders (Respondent Nos.1-3) obtained a compromise de...