Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

790 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 790 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in Sports Contract Disputes Under Sections 11 and 15(2) of Arbitration Act. Arbitrator's failure to render award within statutory period and subsequent resignation justified substitution despite respondent's objection.

22 Jan 2013

The judgment concerns a group of arbitration applications filed under Section 11 and Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Respondent Held Invalid; Former High Court Judge Appointed as Sole Arbitrator.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Eagle – MPCC (J.V.), a joint venture company, entered into a contract with the respondent, South Western Railway, on 08/03/2011...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Feb 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute — Rejects Bias Challenge Based on Non-Disclosure. Failure to disclose by arbitrator does not automatically render award contrary to public policy under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; respondents waived objection by participating in arbitration without raising issue.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the respondents, Avitel Post Studioz Limi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Exparte Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Notice. Appointment of Arbitrator by Respondent Without Petitioner's Consent and Conduct of Proceedings Without Notice to Petitioner Renders Award Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Zenith Fire Services (India) Private Limited, challenged an exparte arbitral award dated 31 October 2011 passed by a sole arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Partnership Dispute Despite Objections to Earlier Appointee. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution and Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Empowers Court to Appoint Arbitrator When Parties Fail to Agree.

20 Dec 2013

The applicants, partners of a dissolved partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

28 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

2 Jun 2020

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Remits Matter for Fresh Consideration on Constitution of Arbitral Tribunal. Court finds that the Arbitral Tribunal was improperly constituted without obtaining petitioner's waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and remits the matter for fresh adjudication by a properly constituted tribunal.

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner, RPN Engineers Chennai Private Limited, was awarded a contract by the respondents (Integral Coach Factory, Chennai) vide Letter of Acce...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)