Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

25 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Assessee's Failure to Prove Revenue Expenditure. The court held that the assessee did not discharge its burden to show that the expenditure was revenue in nature under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Aug 2023

The case pertains to an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had upheld the CI...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Case on Disallowance of Excess Cane Price Paid by Cooperative Society. Excess Payment Over Statutory Price Under Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Held Not Deductible as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Mar 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay against the assessee, Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sikhar Karkhana Limited, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Cases — Holds That Arm's Length Price Determination Must Be Based on Reliable Comparable Data and Functional Analysis. The Tribunal's deletion of adjustments was upheld as it correctly applied functional comparability and permissible adjustments under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

5 Dec 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Advertisement Expenses Not Subject to Disallowance. Assessee's expenditure on promoting foreign channels held to be for its own business benefit, not requiring compensation from foreign principals.

13 Oct 2014

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29th July 2011, which confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Depreciation Rates but Upholds Revenue's Disallowances on Travel Expenses, Medical Reimbursement, Motor Car Perquisite, and Rent as Capital Expenditure. The Court held that depreciation under Section 32 must be allowed at rates as amended from 2.4.1983, while affirming that employee travel expenses after destination are disallowable under Section 39 read with Rule 60, medical reimbursement is part of salary under Section 40(c), actual expenditure on motor cars for directors is to be considered, and rent of Rs.16,91,250/- is capital expenditure.

18 Sep 2012

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5873/Bom/8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Hindalco Industries Tax Case on Section 80HHC Deduction and Capital vs Revenue Expenditure. Tribunal's findings on exclusion of local turnover for export deduction and treatment of financial advisory fees as revenue expenditure upheld.

16 Aug 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-6 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 28.11.2008 in ITA No.3668...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds ITAT Order on Deductions for Gift Expenditure, Entertainment Expenses, Debenture Premium, and Investment Allowance. The court held that the assessee's claims were allowable under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and no substantial question of law arose.

25 Mar 2010

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Disallowance Under Rule 6D and Allowability of Spouse's Foreign Travel Expenses. Disallowance under Rule 6D of Income-tax Rules, 1962 must be computed on annual per employee basis, not per trip; expenditure on wife's foreign trip allowable if wholly and exclusively for business.

15 Jul 2005

The case is an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Income-tax, B...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)