Search Results for "additional fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "additional fee"

1900 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1900 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Section 9 Petition for Enhanced Bank Guarantee in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court holds that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to modify or enhance security already ordered by consent, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any new circumstances warranting additional protection.

24 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Enhanced Liquor Licence Fee by Municipal Corporation. Enhancement of licence fee from Rs. 500 to Rs. 3000 per year held valid under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

9 Dec 2005

The appellant, Kolhapur Zilla Rajya Abkari Parvana Dharak Samajik Seva Sangh, an association of country liquor retailers, filed a suit against the Kol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment on Challenges to Additional Fees Imposed by Central Motor Vehicles Rules. Rule 32 and Rule 81 Under Scrutiny for Alleged Unlawful Levy on Delayed Renewals and Transfers

2 Apr 2024

The Bombay High Court heard a public interest litigation (PIL No.130 of 2022) filed by ‘K’ Savakash Auto Rickshaw Sangha, a registered trust, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Club Membership Fees as Revenue Expenditure. Payment of entrance and subscription fees to Willington Sports Club held to be revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure, as it was for short-term membership renewal and did not create an enduring benefit.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Swiss Re Services India Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 29 March 2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Eviction Suit — Proper Court Fee Paid Under Section 41(2) of KCF & SV Act. Suit for Ejectment of Tenant Valued at Rs.7,15,000/- Based on Annual Rent and Premium, Held to Be Correctly Valued Under Section 41(2) of Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

15 Feb 2024

The respondent, claiming to be the owner of the suit schedule property and alleging that the petitioners are tenants, filed O.S.No.256/2016 before the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Notice for Unauthorized Change of Land Use in Leasehold Property — Petitioners Not Liable for Unauthorized Use by Tenant Without Prior Permission. Leasehold Property Dispute Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Demand for Additional Premium and Penalty Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

18 Oct 2006

The petitioners, Tulsiram Rangwala Trust, Rikhiram T. Arora, and Shivram Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd., challenged a demand notice dated 30th March 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Court Fee Stamp Not Illegal Gratification. Court holds that asking for money to purchase court fee stamps for bail application does not constitute demand of illegal gratification under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

28 Jun 2012

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of two respondents, Uddhav Kashinath Chandekar and Kisan Udaybhan Mhatarmare, who were charged...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down LIC Circular Imposing Assignment Charge on Finance Organizations as Ultra Vires Section 38 of Insurance Act, 1938. The court held that LIC cannot impose a charge on assignments of life insurance policies in favor of finance companies as it amounts to a restriction on the statutory right of assignment under Section 38.

19 May 2010

The petitioners, Dravya Finance Pvt. Ltd. (a Non-Banking Finance Company) and its director Hasmukh Rawal, challenged a Circular dated 24.4.2006 issued...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)