Search Results for "accidental omission"

291 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 305 IPC for Abetment of Suicide of a Minor — No Mens Rea or Instigation Established. Accused's Allegation of Theft of Rs.50 by Deceased Child Does Not Constitute Abetment to Commit Suicide Under Section 305 IPC.

The applicant, Sarla Ratnakar Dhumal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Well Disposal Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Sustain Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellants, Gautam Kamlakar Pardeshi and Rahul @ Lalya Yogesh Jadhav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove direct nexus between alleged cruelty and suicide.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Maruti Shirsat, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 277/1997 for offences pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-Laws for Murder by Burning in Dowry Death Case. Life Imprisonment Maintained Under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

The case arises from a criminal appeal filed by four accused persons (husband, father-in-law, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Chandar s/o Laxman Rakhunde and Shobha w/o Chandar Rakhunde, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the murder ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves a criminal appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Shakuntalabai and Manoj Joshi, for the murder of Prabhabai Joshi under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder in Marital Dispute Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed based on dying declaration and circumstantial evidence.

The appellant, Prakash Baburao Shelar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the India...