Search Results for "Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act"

157 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

14 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Rioting in Caste-Based Violence Case — Life Imprisonment for Offences Under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC and Related Offences. The court affirmed that the appellants were members of an unlawful assembly with a common object to attack the complainant's family, resulting in one death and multiple injuries, and that the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports supported the conviction.

27 Jul 2016

The case arises from a violent incident on 25th March 2008 in Dahitane village, Solapur district, where a group of accused persons, allegedly belongin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.4 in UAP Act Case on Grounds of Parity and Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy. Petitioner-accused No.4, not named in FIR, granted bail as co-accused already released and no material showing his involvement in conspiracy under Sections 13, 16, 18, 20, 38 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Riyaz Ahamed Sayeedi, accused No.4, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail ...

Supreme Court

Arvind Kejriwal Challenges Legality of Arrest Under PML Act: Delhi High Court Appeal. Examining Judicial Safeguards and Proportionality in Arrest Procedures

12 Jul 2024

This appeal, filed by Arvind Kejriwal, challenges the legality of his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Preventio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Case -- Daughter's Appeal Succeeds on Grounds of Insufficient Material for Public Order Threat

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal challenging the preventive detention order against Aruna Bai alias Anguri Bai under the Telangana Prevention of Da...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 20 of NIA Act — Transfer of Case to Sessions Court Not Warranted as Investigation by State Police Was Valid and NIA Investigation Not Mandatory.

8 Jul 2019

The case originated from Crime No.11 of 2015 registered by Pulakeshinagar Police Station, Bengaluru, against three accused persons for offences under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bail Appeal in NIA Case — Accused No.16 in Terror Conspiracy Case Denied Bail Due to Prima Facie Involvement and Flight Risk. The court held that the accused's active participation in the conspiracy and the serious nature of offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 warranted denial of bail.

15 Jun 2023

The appellant, Zabiulla @ Zabibulla, accused No.16 in Spl.C.C.No.320/2020, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under MCOC Act for Demanding Protection Money as Organised Crime. Demand of Khandani by Gang Member Constitutes Organised Crime Under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(4) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act, 1999.

27 Feb 2006

The appellant, Bhaya alias Raju s/o Shankar Rajput, was convicted by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOC Act...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Bootlegging Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(2) of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985 set aside as grounds did not show that ordinary law was insufficient to prevent the detenu from acting prejudicially.

12 Jul 2024

The petitioner, wife of Sharath @ Sharath Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detenti...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)