WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024
21 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Unauthorized absence"
810 result(s) found
Found 810 result(s)
High Court
- 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Effective Implementation of Highway Safety Laws to Prevent Encroachments and Ensure Road Safety. The Court found that the provisions of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 were not being effectively implemented, leading to unsafe highways and unauthorized encroachments.
21 May 2025The petitioner, Gyan Prakash, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raising a critical issue regarding the safety of Nat...
- 265
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Demolition Case — Municipal Corporation's Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act, 1988 Challenged. Court Held That Trial Court Erred in Not Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience, and Directed Status Quo Pending Suit.
4 Sep 2023The appellant, Sandesh Sonu Gawalkar, filed a civil appeal against an order dated 24 June 2022 passed by the City Civil Court, which refused to grant ...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Seaman for Unauthorized Absence. Petitioner failed to report back after medical disembarkation and did not respond to show-cause notice, leading to valid closure of service under SCI Standing Orders.
27 Jun 2022The petitioner, Rajiv Singh, joined the Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. as a Cadet in 1975 and was promoted to 3rd Officer by 1979. On 23 June 2001...
- 29
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Land Dispute — Alternative Civil Remedy Available. Petitioner's representations to Deputy Commissioner for action against private respondents cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction when civil suit for injunction is already pending.
17 Oct 2017The petitioner, R. Lakshman @ Lakshmana Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamu...
- 59
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Councillor Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act — Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Court Held That the Power Under Section 10(1D) Must Be Exercised After Giving a Reasonable Opportunity of Hearing and by a Reasoned Order.
6 Apr 2016The petitioner, Shri Mallesh Shivan Shetty, was elected as a councillor from Ward No. 42 of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation in October/November...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Municipal Corporation Suit — Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 433A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Can Be Considered Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that a suit challenging a notice under Section 260 for unauthorized construction is barred by Section 433A, and the bar can be examined under Order VII Rule 11 even if not apparent from the plaint.
29 Apr 2013The case involves a civil revision application filed by the Commissioner of Akola Municipal Corporation against an order of the Trial Court rejecting ...
- 300
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.
15 Nov 2011The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.
7 Jun 2010The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...
- 53
