Search Results for "Suresh Nanda"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when courts below have concurrently found that suit property is joint family property and plaintiff is entitled to share.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants No.2 to 4 against the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Latur, in Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing of Domestic Violence Complaint Against Female Relatives. Definition of 'Respondent' Under Section 2(q) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Includes Adult Female Members of Family.

The applicants, who are adult female members of the family, challenged an order dated 10/3/2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapon, and motive.

The appellants, Devendra @ Bittya Bhausaheb Padale and Sunil Gulabrao Yadav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction but Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient for Conviction but Case Does Not Fall in 'Rarest of Rare' Category

The case pertains to the confirmation of death sentence awarded to Anil Jagannath Pawar by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, in Sessions Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intention to Cause Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Pranjay Purushotambhai Goradia, was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code,...