Search Results for "Shareholder Rights"

241 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 241 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Shareholders in Capital Receipt Case — One Million Euros Received from Vedior NV Held Exempt as Capital Receipt. Compensation for Loss of Right of First Refusal and Non-Compete Agreement Treated as Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals by shareholders (K. Pandiarajan and R. Hemalatha) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which up...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Company Law Dispute Over Maintainability of Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Nomination Under Section 72 of Companies Act, 2013 Vests Rights in Nominee, Excluding Legal Heirs from Claiming Shares for Petition Maintainability Under Sections 241 and 242.

The dispute arose from a family tussle following the death of Mr. Abhey Kumar Oswal, who held significant shares in Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. and Oswal Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Consent Order in Company Oppression Case — Parties Bound by Consensus. Consent order for share buyout under Sections 397-398 of Companies Act, 1956 cannot be challenged by consenting party.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shalby Limited and others against an order dated 25.04.2016 passed by the Company Law Board (CLB), New Delhi Benc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...