Search Results for "Section 74(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Section 74(1)"

222 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Prosecution in Drugs & Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Violations and Non-Compliance with Statutory Mandates. Prosecution was invalidated because of inordinate delay in sample testing, failure to dispatch sample portion to manufacturer depriving retesting right, and improper cognizance by Special Judge without committal under Section 193 CrPC, under Section 27(d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in its criminal appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order promptly and reliance on a case where detenue was not involved vitiates the subjective satisfaction under the MPDA Act.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Service on Detenue in Judicial Custody and Reliance on Irrelevant Material. The court held that failure to serve detention order on detenue while in judicial custody and reliance on a criminal case in which detenue was not involved renders the order illegal.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dikshant @ Dadu Devidas Sapkale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon u...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Delay of Over Two Months Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

24 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Aburojakani, mother of the detenu Mohammed Yusuf, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Unexplained delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 snaps live link, rendering detention invalid.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Thiru Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 02....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Coke Industry Against Coal India Over Pricing Dispute — Linked Price vs. Liberalised Sales Scheme (LSS) Price. Court Holds That Resolution of Linkage Committee Did Not Confer Right to Preferential Price, and Price Was to Be Charged as Prevalent at Any Point of Time.

7 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s S.K.J. Coke Industries Ltd. and its predecessor Mahabir Coke Industries (appellants) and Coal India Ltd. a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Sentence of Convict in Misappropriation Case Due to Old Age and Payment of Fine. The court confirmed conviction under relevant sections but reduced imprisonment to period already undergone, considering the accused's age and willingness to pay additional fine.

12 Feb 2019

The applicant, Navnitlal Prabhudas Thakkar, was convicted by the trial court for misappropriation of government money amounting to Rs. 23,495.10 by fa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

23 Nov 2018

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BCCI Disciplinary Committee's Refusal to Recuse Members. Natural Justice Requires Impartial Adjudication; Bias Allegations Against Committee Members Must Be Examined.

15 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Modi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11th August 2010 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets 'Setting Up' of Establishment Under Section 16(1)(b) of Employees Provident Funds Act, 1952, Determining Whether Change of Ownership Creates New Establishment for Exemption Purposes. The Court Clarified the Test for Fresh Exemption Period When an Existing Business is Transferred to a New Owner.

17 Sep 1969

...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)