Search Results for "Section 66(1)"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Proceedings Initiated Without Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227. Upa-Lokayukta lacked authority to act on private complaint without government reference under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

The petitioner, Sri M.V. Srinivasa Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals of Occupants Challenging Eviction from Comunidade Land — Appellants Failed to Prove Title or Authorisation, Eviction Upheld Under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC and Section 38 Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves five first appeals filed by Ayub Khan, Khurshida Ahmad, Salim Sandhi, Mehmood A. Ansari, and Dadapir Lohar against the State of Goa,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Federation Against Labour Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workman Status Denied Due to Supervisory Role. Respondent's designation as Centre In-charge with supervisory duties excluded him from definition of 'workman' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Maryadit (the Federation) challenging the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death. Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Exclude Innocence.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 21st April 1998 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ratna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Commission Dispute. Debt Held Bona Fide Disputed Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Total Sports & Entertainment India Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) and 434 of the Companies Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes MCI Order Striking Off Doctor's Name from Medical Register for One Year for Alleged Violation of Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 — Failure to Report Organ Retrieval from Deceased Donor Not a Ground for Erasure of Name.

The petitioner, Dr. Ramcharan Thiagarajan, a renowned surgical gastroenterologist and multi-organ transplant surgeon, was working as a consultant at F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Award Upheld. The court found no error in the Tribunal's assessment of compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of Rajesh Shah in a vehicular accident.

The case involves an appeal by the New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 23rd September 2011 passed by the Motor Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Decides on the Validity of Arbitral Award Covering Foreign Immoveable Properties Excluded from Preliminary Decree in a Partition Suit. Construction of Reference to Arbitration under Section 21 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 Clarified.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by the respondent, Subramaniam Chettiar, against his brother, Nachiappa Chettiar, and his sons (appellan...