Search Results for "Section 377"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Unnatural Sex and Extortion Case — Mentally Ill Victim's Testimony Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Parents' Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 377 and 387 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ramcharan Ramavadh Yadav against his conviction under Sections 377 and 387 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in State Appeal Against Inadequacy of Sentence Under Section 377 CrPC. Court holds that sentence of imprisonment already undergone for offence under Section 304 Part II IPC is inadequate and enhances to 5 years rigorous imprisonment.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the judgment dated 18.02.2010 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Cruelty and Unnatural Sex Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegations Under Sections 498A and 377 IPC Fail as Complainant's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Unnatural Sex.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 17/6/1999 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 26th Court, Borivali, Mumbai, ...