Search Results for "Section 279"

827 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 827 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, and 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilty Mind Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Manasing Tukaram Lamani, was the accused in C.C. No. 208/2011 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalkot. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Repeal Case Based on Possession Taken Over. Vesting Under Section 11(3) of Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 Saved as Land Owner Voluntarily Surrendered Possession, Satisfying Section 3 of Repeal Act, 1999.

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and officials from the Department of Urban Land Ceiling, challenging o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Appellant in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rashness or Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused drove in a rash or negligent manner causing death.

The appellant, Sagar Lolienkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, South Goa, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death in Motor Accident Case. Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present appeal was filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. by the original accused No.1, Sanjay Bhavrao @ Baburao Sapkal, challenging his conviction in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Discharge in Rash Driving Case. Court holds that prima facie case exists against accused for offences under Sections 279 and 304 of IPC and Sections 5, 180, 14, 106, 190, 115 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The judgment pertains to two criminal revision petitions filed by accused persons challenging the order dated 30.06.2016 passed by the LXIX Additional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Fatal Bus Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash and Negligent Driving. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The petitioner, Medappa, was the driver of a bus that met with an accident on 28 July 2000 at about 9:30 a.m., resulting in the death of eight passeng...