Search Results for "Section 209 CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Section 209 CrPC"

120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Committal Order in Drugs Case for Lack of Jurisdiction — Magistrate Exceeded Powers by Committing Case Triable by Magistrate to Sessions Court Without Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The court held that the offence under Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 is triable by a Magistrate and cannot be committed to Sessions Court under Section 209 CrPC, and the prosecution was invalid without prior sanction under Section 32 of the Act.

19 Dec 2025

The petitioners, Mukut Bihari Goyal, Manohar Lal Sharma, and M/s Smilax Pharmaceuticals, challenged an order dated 16.10.2019 passed by the Judicial M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Public View. Land Dispute and Caste-Based Allegations Fail to Sustain Conviction Under SC &amp; ST Act

14 Oct 2025

Criminal Law-- Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 363, 366, 506 and 376-- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO)- Section 4-- The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Penalty to Life Imprisonment in Multiple Murder Case — Land Dispute Led to Brutal Killing of Four Family Members, but Case Not 'Rarest of Rare'. The court upheld conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of four persons but found mitigating circumstances outweighing aggravating factors, commuting death to life imprisonment.

13 Nov 2024

The case arises from a brutal incident on 28 June 2015 where three accused, Haribhau Telgote (66), his wife Dwarkabai (55), and their son Shyam (35), ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance Order in SC/ST Act Case — Holds That Special Court Can Take Cognizance Directly and That High Court's Refusal to Quash Proceedings Was Not Erroneous.

7 Mar 2022

The case involves a special leave petition filed by Ramveer Upadhyay and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stay on Bail Order in NIA Case — Special Judge Cannot Stay Own Bail Order Under Section 309(1) CrPC. The court held that the power to grant bail does not include the power to stay the bail order, and Section 309(1) CrPC does not authorize such a stay.

8 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Naresh Ramniklal Gaur, was granted bail on 20th November 2021 by the Special Court at Greater Bombay in NIA Special Case No. 1090/2021...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Defamation Case Against 23 Accused for Lack of Sanction Under Section 199 CrPC. Private Complaint for Defamation Under Section 500 IPC Cannot Proceed Without Prior Sanction from Competent Authority When Alleged Defamation Relates to Publication of a Report by a Public Servant in Official Capacity.

15 Feb 2021

The petitioners, 23 individuals, were accused in a private complaint filed by the respondent under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) fo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Stays Gauhati High Court's Direction to Prosecute Motor Vehicle Offences Only Under MV Act — Issue of Prosecution Under IPC Left Open. The Court Held That the MV Act Is Primarily a Beneficial Legislation for Compensation and Chapter XIII Deals with Regulatory Offences, Not Barring IPC Prosecution.

4 Oct 2019

The case arose from a judgment of the Gauhati High Court, Agartala bench, dated 22.12.2008, which held that road traffic offences should be prosecuted...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition, Holds Accused Cannot Cross-Examine Approver at Pre-Committal Stage Under Section 306(4) CrPC. The right to cross-examine the approver arises only after committal to the Court of Sessions, as the examination under Section 306(4) is for committal purposes only.

18 Apr 2016

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which allowed the respondents (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Summons Under Section 319 CrPC in Murder Case — Co-accused's Application to Summon Petitioner Upheld as Trial Court Had Prima Facie Material.

8 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Amit Anand Nare, challenged an order passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag, which allowed an application filed b...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail in Forgery Case — MLA and BJP Secretary Accused of Fabricating Disqualification Petition. Court holds that anticipatory bail granted without notice to prosecution or consideration of relevant material is liable to be cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC.

13 Jan 2006

The applicants, Satish Dhond and Sadanand Shet Tanavade, were accused in Crime No.15/2005 registered under Sections 465, 468, 471 read with 34 IPC at ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)