Search Results for "Salem District"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Compliance with Order in WP No. 27269 of 2025. Respondents Demonstrated Compliance by Producing Proceedings Dated 19.09.2025.

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging that the respondents, the District Collector a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Based on Solitary Ground Case. Preventive detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 held unsustainable as ordinary criminal law is sufficient to deal with the case.

The petitioner, Angayi Kanakarathinam, mother of the detenu Ranganathan alias Rangarajan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Ordinary Leave to Convict Prisoner Despite Incorrect Reason in Application. Court invokes Article 226 powers to grant 21 days ordinary leave without escort, relying on satisfactory conduct and favourable probation report.

The petitioner, brother of the convict prisoner Arulmurugan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Board's Petition Challenging Injunction Against Disconnection for Non-Payment of Arrears. Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Used to Restrain Disconnection Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (now Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.), challenged an order passed by the Civil...