Search Results for "SEBI regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "SEBI regulations"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Accused in Money Laundering Case Due to Absence of Scheduled Offence. The court held that the alleged offences under Sections 406, 407, 415 to 420, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, did not constitute a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002, rendering the money laundering charge unsustainable under Section 3 of the PMLA.

20 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint registered as FIR No. 664/2013 on 29 October 2013 with the Cyberabad Police against six persons, including...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Trade Union's Petition Against Disinvestment of Government Shareholding in Public Sector Undertaking. Disinvestment Policy Upheld as Within Executive Domain, and Previous Litigation Barred Re-agitation Under Res Judicata in Public Interest Litigation Under Article 32 of Constitution.

18 Nov 2021

The National Confederation of Officers Association of Central Public Sector Enterprises, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act 1926, alo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Majority Arbitral Award in Share Subscription Dispute — Put Option and Performance Clause Enforceable Despite Foreign Investment Regulations. The court dismissed a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the award did not contravene FEMA or SEBI regulations and was not against public policy.

11 Dec 2018

This judgment by the Bombay High Court deals with two connected arbitration petitions arising from a share subscription and shareholders agreement dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding of Fraud and Limitation Based on SEBI Circular. The Court held that the Arbitrator's findings on limitation and fraud were plausible and not perverse, and the petition lacked merit under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Jan 2014

The Petitioner, Reliance Securities Limited, a stock broker and member of the National Stock Exchange, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Arbitrator's Refusal to Entertain Counterclaim Upheld as Within Jurisdiction. The court held that the arbitrator's decision to refrain from adjudicating the counterclaim regarding surplus in NSE capital market was within his jurisdiction and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Uttam Chand Garg, challenged an arbitral award dated 16th March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under the byelaws of the National Sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds in Light of SEBI Circulars Extending Limitation Period from Six Months to Three Years. The court remitted the matter to the Arbitral Tribunal for reconsideration of limitation under the extended period.

27 Feb 2012

The petitioner, India Infoline Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Release from Investor Protection Fund Due to Client Code Mismatch. Claim Rejected as Contract Notes Did Not Match Trade Files of Stock Exchange.

27 Feb 2006

The petitioner, Saurin T. Parikh, proprietor of Shah Investment, filed a writ petition seeking to set aside an order dated 25th May 2005 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court's Dismissal of Suit on Ground of Arbitration Clause Under Stock Exchange Bye-laws. Transaction Not Through Stock Exchange Member, Hence Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Recovery Suit.

9 Jan 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Prashant Commercial, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 23 lakhs against the respondent, Rajratan R. Mohta, claiming that the amou...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)