Search Results for "SARFAESI Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "SARFAESI Act"

415 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Filed by Secured Creditor and Auction Purchasers, Quashing Attachment Orders of State Tax Authorities. Priority of Secured Creditor Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Held to Override ‘First Charge’ and Non-Obstante Clauses in the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

13 Jul 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a batch of six writ petitions filed by a secured creditor and auction purchasers, quashing various atta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment Over Bank's Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act — Priority of Secured Creditor Upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over crown debts, and attachment by sales tax authorities cannot defeat the bank's security interest.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Union Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an attachment order dated 2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Revision Against Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Recovery Suits — Held That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law. The court upheld the trial court's finding that the suits based on invocation of bank guarantees were within limitation and disclosed a cause of action.

5 Jun 2023

The present judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications filed by the Regional Manager and Assistant General Manager of Union Bank of India (o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

24 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order for Release of Secured Asset on Partial Payment Under SARFAESI Act. The court held that Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 requires full payment of dues for redemption, and partial payment does not entitle the borrower to reclaim the property.

10 Feb 2022

The dispute arose between a bank, as secured creditor, and a borrower over the enforcement of security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction Sale Due to Alternate Remedy Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner, as second highest bidder, alleged collusion and system malfunction but was directed to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal.

5 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Radhika Rajesh Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Technical Defect in Demand Notice Not Fatal When No Prejudice Caused. The Court held that a mere inadvertent use of a different group company name on the demand notice does not invalidate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act if the borrower was not misled and no substantial prejudice was caused.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s. L&T Housing Finance Limited (appellant) and M/s. Trishul Developers and another (respondents) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

5 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)