Search Results for "Retention Money"

224 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of IGST on Ocean Freight -- Sets Aside Appellate Order Directing Limitation Verification -- Reliance on Precedents for Mistake of Law Refunds

The petitioners imported fertilizers on CIF basis, paying IGST on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism as per RCM Notification No.10/2017. Aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Limits Rental Compensation to Three Years Under Section 35(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Temporary Acquisition Claimants Not Entitled to Statutory Benefits or Compensation Beyond Three-Year Period.

The appellant, Deputy General Manager (presumably of a public sector undertaking), challenged the judgment and decree dated 16.05.2008 passed by the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of EMD in Tender Dispute - Petitioner Entitled to Full Refund of Earnest Money Deposit as Forfeiture Without Specific Clause is Unjust Enrichment. The Court directed refund of balance 10% EMD of Rs.12 lakhs as retention without contractual basis is impermissible.

The Petitioner, M/s. API Civilcon Private Limited, filed a Writ Petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...