Search Results for "Recovery of weapon"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution's case based on last seen theory and recovery of weapon found insufficient to convict accused under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Soma @ Somanna, was convicted by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural District, in S.C. No. 136/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Found Complete.

The appellant, Naresh Bhalchandra Sawant, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Chandrashekhar and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Double Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive, Recovery of Weapon, and Dog Tracking, Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajaram Limbaji Babar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of two individuals, Subhadrabai and Nivr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Wife and Paramour for Murder of Husband Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial evidence including ligature marks, recovery of weapon, and extra-judicial confession established guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case pertains to the murder of Ganesh Motiram Sakpal, husband of appellant Ashwini Ganesh Sakpal (accused No.1). The prosecution alleged that Ashw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Dying declaration made to husband immediately after incident held admissible and reliable under Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appellant, Anwar Imamsab Rangrej, was convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, in Sessions Case No. 153 of 2001 for the murder of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Firearm Injury. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Postmortem Report Did Not Describe Any Firearm Injury and Recovery of Weapon Was Not Credible.

The appellant, Ramesh Babulal Soni @ Chamat, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, recovery of weapon was doubtful, and extra-judicial confession was not corroborated.

The appellant, Ramsewak Gaur, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his brother Vijay under Section 302 ...