Search Results for "Railways"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Railways"

522 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation to Dependents of Railway Employee in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Contradictory Evidence. Accidental Fall from Moving Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Employee with Free Pass Qualifies as Bonafide Passenger Regardless of Pass Recovery at Site.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by dependents of a railway employee who died after falling from a train. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

19 Sep 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

25 Jul 2019

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Railways Compensation Case, Clarifying Calculation Method. The court held that compensation for untoward incidents under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 must be calculated as per the rate on the date of accident with interest, and if the revised amount on award date is higher, the higher amount is payable without interest on the revised sum.

29 Jan 2019

The case arises from an untoward incident on 02.10.2003 when Dasarath Yadav, while travelling in a local train from Burdwan to Howrah, peeped his head...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Auction of Unbooked Luggage Under Section 83 of Railways Act, 1989 — Auction of Unbooked Luggage Without Proper Notice and Valuation Held Illegal.

20 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sau. Nirmala w/o Vijaykumar Thakur, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the auction o...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses State Bank of India's Challenge to CAT Order Directing Payment of 12% Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Retired Railway Employee. Bank Held Liable for Delay in Disbursement Despite Railways Depositing Funds Timely.

21 Mar 2017

The petitioner, State Bank of India, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Nagpur, dated 03/05/2013, which directed the b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case — Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989 Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court held that the notice dated 25-01-1993 was valid and the claim was not barred by limitation, as the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to the Railway Claims Tribunal.

11 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Railway Non-Delivery Case Due to Invalid Notice Under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989. Notice Served Beyond Six-Month Limitation Period and Addressed to Wrong Authority.

4 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Sapna Emporium, filed a first appeal against the judgment and order dated 22-09-1995 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Fall from Overcrowded Train Due to Jerk is Untoward Incident. Parents of Deceased Bonafide Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989; Railway's Defence of Fake Ticket and Footboard Travel Rejected for Lack of Evidence.

23 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, against the judgment and order dated 18th Augu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways Appeal in Passenger Death Case. Strict Liability for Untoward Incident Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Upheld as Deceased Was Bona Fide Passenger.

28 Feb 2012

The Union of India, General Manager, Central Railways, filed an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the awar...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)