Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

463 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Discharge of Executrix Set Aside. Court holds that mere delay in filing accounts does not warrant removal of an executrix under Section 301 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, especially when no loss or prejudice is caused to the estate.

The appellant, Ms. Neeru Batra, was appointed as the executrix of the Will of the deceased. She filed a petition for probate, which was granted. Subse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Commercial Suit — Decree for Rs.4.25 Crores Granted on Alleged Admission in Claim for Rs.22.66 Crore

The appeal arises from an order dated 28 April 2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Notice of Motion No. 2393 of 2019 in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petitions for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Compliance with Directions. Failure to File Affidavit of Documents and Appear Before Court Leads to Dismissal Under Rule 34 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.

The judgment concerns two company petitions (CP 496/2014 and CP 497/2014) filed by Janak Herkishen Vaswani and Mrs. Renuka Herkishen Vaswani respectiv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Order in Property Dispute Due to Limitation. Delay of Over 3 Years in Challenging Ex-Parte Decree Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Held Not Sufficiently Explained.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Smt. Gopi, widow of Tarachand R. Advani, seeking to set aside an ex-parte order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...