Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

21 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Failure to Explain Gap Between Prejudicial Activities and Detention Order Breaks Live Link and Vitiates Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Explain Delay of Over Three Months.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Rajesh Vasant Jadhav, challenged an order of detention dated 30th June 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay, unde...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

16 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Mohammadanawaz @ Salman Mohsmmadyusuf Shekh, through his mother Shekh Kamrunisha Mohammadyusuf, challenged the legality and validity o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu Already in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Preventive detention held unjustified when there was no imminent possibility of release on bail, as the detenu had not applied for bail and was in judicial custody.

21 Jul 2010

The petitioner, father of the detenu Pritesh Dinesh Doshi, challenged the detention order dated 11/8/2009 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 set aside as live nexus between smuggling activity and detention order snapped by 10-month delay.

27 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Farida Imram Chamundi, wife of the detenu, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Criminal Antecedents Without Evidence of Public Order Disturbance.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Ashok Kisan Jadhav, challenged his detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981 Citing Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Flaws. Detention Based on Stale Past Incidents and Improper Communication of Right to Representation Raises Concerns Under Article 22(5).

26 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a resident of Aurangabad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive det...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in PASA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives and Inadequate Material Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider whether the detenue can be dealt with under regular law before resorting to preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Rahul Jyoti Sahani, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (as extended to Dadr...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)