Search Results for "Presumption Rebutted"

450 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Analysis of Dishonored Cheques Case. Delve into the intricacies of evidence, witness testimonies, and contractual obligations in a high-stakes legal battle over dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

The case revolves around the issuance of cheques by Ambitious Marketing to Kores (India) Ltd. for goods received but not honored due to "payment stopp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, Srinidhi Finance & Investment Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Basavanthappa, for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused Who Did Not Enter Witness Box. Acquittal Set Aside as Perverse; Accused Convicted and Fined ₹2,50,000 with Compensation to Complainant.

The appellant, Ivan Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, Shivaji Tukaram Naik, by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Cheque Dishonour Based on Presumption Under Section 139. Hand Loan of Rs.35,000/- Proved; Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Smt. Sumedha Chaudhari, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent-accused, Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt or Liability. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld as Complainant Did Not Establish Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Nupur Sales Corporation, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19.06.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...