Search Results for "Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Determines Reference on Maintainability of Section 18 Reference Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After 2013 Act Came into Force. Key Issue Involves Whether Landowners Can Seek Enhancement Under Old Act When Award Passed After Commencement of 2013 Act.

Background: The matter arose from a land acquisition proceeding initiated by the Pune Municipal Corporation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. A no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Maha Lok Adalat Order Due to Delay and Laches. Challenge to Change Report Under Section 22 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 Barred by Delay of Over Two Years.

The petitioner, Rajabhau Damodar Raikar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Maha ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition in Commercial Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator Directed. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Carol Info Services Ltd., filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...