Search Results for "Pay Refixation"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Pensioner's Writ Appeal for Retrospective Pay Scale and Arrears Due to 20-Year Delay. Delay and Laches of Over 20 Years in Filing Claim for Retrospective Regular Pay Scale from 1992 Results in Dismissal.

The Madras High Court dismissed a writ appeal filed by a pensioner seeking retrospective grant of regular time scale of pay, arrears of salary, and re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Dispute. Rateable Value of Godown-cum-Office Fixed at Rs. 45,835/- Based on Standard Rent Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 218D of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Additional Increments to Graduate Employees Promoted to Clerks in BEST Undertaking. The court held that BCR No.19 applies to all graduate clerks, including those promoted from lower categories, and denial amounts to unfair labour practice.

The case involves a challenge by the BEST Undertaking against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 20 March 2021, in Complaint (ULP) No. 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Disabled Employee for Retrospective Appointment. Reservation for Persons with Disabilities in Group C and D Posts Can Be Computed Together Under Government Resolution Dated 6 May 2004.

The petitioner, Santosh Gajanan Khilari, a person with 60% locomotive disability of the lower limb, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitrary Revision of Seniority of Directors in Indian Postal Service for Violation of Article 16 of Constitution. Selective Promotion Not Based on Seniority and Revision Without Rule Held Discriminatory.

The petitioners, S. K. Ghosh and another, were promoted from Postal Superintendents Service Class II to the time scale of Class I Service in the India...