Search Results for "Parishad servant"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petition Against Pensionary Benefits for Daily Wagers Made Permanent. Past Daily Wage Service Counts as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Chief Executive Officer of Vita Nagar Parishad, a local authority, challenging the orders of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Teacher Convicted for Abetment of Suicide — Conviction for Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Justifies Dismissal Under Rule 9(1) of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads District Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964

The petitioner, Sau. Sandhya w/o Anil Deshmukh, was an Assistant Teacher employed with Panchayat Samiti, Chandur Railway, under the Zilla Parishad, Am...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Disqualification of Sarpanch. Teacher in Aided School Not a Government Servant Under Section 14(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Shivaji Manohar Kale, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of Asegaon Gram Panchayat. Respondent No. 4 filed a complaint alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of MSEDCL Employees — Transfer Policy Upheld as Binding. Allegations of Mala Fides Not Entertained Without Impleading the Officer.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL), challenged their transfer orders issued by the company...