Search Results for "National Consumer Commission"

436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Consumer Appeal in Car Delivery Dispute, Restoring Lower Forum Orders. National Commission Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Interfering with Concurrent Findings of Fact on Used Car Delivery.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint where the appellant booked and paid the full sale consideration for a new Tata Victa GX TC car from the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Consumer Protection Act Penalty Case for Violation of Summary Trial Procedure. Failure to Record Plea and Conduct Trial as Per Sections 254 and 262 CrPC Renders Proceedings Void.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, was convicted by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Farmers' Insurance Claim in Cold Storage Fire — Insurer Liable Despite No Privity of Contract. Farmers are Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and Insurance Company Must Pay for Loss of Stored Agricultural Produce.

The case involves multiple appeals arising from a common order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission regarding a fire that occurred o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...