Search Results for "NSE Regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "NSE Regulations"

69 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Finding That Trades Were Authorized by Client. Court holds that under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the arbitral award is not patently illegal or perverse and does not warrant interference.

17 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Sharma, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Public Policy — Shares Directed to be Returned to Third Party Not Party to Arbitration. The court held that an award affecting rights of a person not party to arbitration is contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Dec 2014

The petitioners, original constituents, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the final award da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings on Contract Notes and Liability Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kalyansinh K. Kumpavat, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Perverse.

2 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Sunil Keshav Rane, challenged an arbitral award dated 28 April 2009 passed by an arbitrator under the Byelaws, Rules and Regulations o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Lack of Reasons on Counterclaim and Limitation. Arbitrator Must Provide Sufficient Reasons When Rejecting Counterclaim on Limitation and Merits Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Arun T. Gujrathi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Organon (India) Limited — Scheme Approved Despite Objection Regarding Valuation and Fairness. Court held that the reduction was fair and reasonable, and the objection regarding valuation was not sustainable as the price was based on SEBI delisting guidelines and accepted by majority shareholders.

7 Jun 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Scheme Petition filed by Organon (India) Limited seeking sanction and confirmation of a special resolution passed by i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute — Technical Glitch Not a Valid Defense for Non-Execution of Order. The Court held that the Arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Broking Limited, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Violation of Right to Legal Representation Found. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate any denial of opportunity to engage a lawyer before the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal against an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitral award was not in conflict with public policy and did not suffer from patent illegality, as the tribunal's findings were based on evidence and were plausible.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, MPDA Associates Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration ...

4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)