High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent
8 Aug 2024The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...
Search Results for "Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board"
107 result(s) found
Found 107 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Compensation for Land Acquired 36 Years Ago Without Award — Violation of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution. Non-payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition under Section 93(5) of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, held arbitrary and unconstitutional; court orders payment with interest at 9% per annum from date of possession.
1 Aug 2024The petitioner, Yusuf Yunus Kantharia, was the owner of a plot of land measuring 979 sq. metres in Dharavi, Mumbai, along with a chawl known as Kantha...
- 1033
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Appellate Order in Rent Control Eviction Case — Tenant's Subletting and Change of User Not Proved. Court Restores Rent Controller's Eviction Order on Ground of Bona Fide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
31 Oct 2023The case involves a civil revision application filed by the landlord, Hemantkumar Prabhudasji Vora, challenging the order dated 18/04/2013 passed by t...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 After Reconstruction. Court Holds Grievance Rendered Academic by Interim Reconstruction and Directs Consideration of Regularization Under the Act.
9 Jun 2020The petitioner, a lessee of a structure in Dharavi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a show-ca...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
3 May 2018The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Estate Officer’s Jurisdiction Under PP Act Against SARFAESI Possession. Asset Reconstruction Company Asserts SARFAESI Act Overrides PP Act, Requiring Landlord to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal.
24 Aug 2016The writ petitioner, an Asset Reconstruction Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered under the SARFAESI Act, challenged the ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.
19 Mar 2015The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Upon Legality of Hotel Construction in Coastal Regulation Zone III Area Without Mandatory Ministry Approval. Developers Allegedly Built in No Development Zone Without Necessary MEF Clearance Despite CRZ Notification Requiring Prior Approval.
26 Feb 2014Background: The petitioners, two public interest organizations, filed writ petitions challenging the construction of a hotel in Goa by respondent nos....
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development of Textile Mill Lands in Mumbai — Heritage Conservation and Public Interest Claims Rejected as Premature and Without Merit. The court held that no cause of action arises until a final decision is made by the Heritage Conservation Committee or other authorities.
5 May 2006The Bombay High Court dismissed three notices of motion in a writ petition filed by the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction in Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. Court upholds demolition of structures built without valid permission under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, holding that no prior notice is required when construction is patently illegal.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, AM Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of certain structures by the Municipal Corporation...
- 243
