Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

524 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 524 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Forest Department Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Daily Wage Workers. The Industrial Court's order directing grant of permanency to workers engaged for years as daily wagers was upheld as no error of jurisdiction or perversity was found.

The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Nashik Van Vibhag (E), Nasik and others (petitioners) filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Allowing Union Registration Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the National Institute of Industrial Engineering (NITIE) challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reinstatement Order in Forgery Case. Industrial Court's Power to Grant Reinstatement Without Remand Under Section 44 MRTU & PULP Act Upheld as Enquiry Findings Were Perverse.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the order of the Industrial Court which, in revision under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Provide Facilities to Recognised Union Under MRTU and PULP Act. Recognised Union Entitled to Same Facilities as Unrecognised Union Under Section 20 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, challenged an order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 919 of 2001. The respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...