Search Results for "MPDA Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MPDA Act"

260 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Procedural Lapses Petitioner Challenges Preventive Detention Based on Arms Act Offences and In-camera Statements -- Court Finds Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Violation of Article 22 Safeguards

4 Feb 2026

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition challenging a detention order under the MPDA Act, which directed his detention for 12 months on grounds ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Against Bootlegger Under MPDA Act — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Inadequate Verification of Witness Statements Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority did not consider bail orders and verification of anonymous witnesses was flawed, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

8 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Dhanubai @ Dhanno Yashvant Netlekar, challenged an order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalgaon, detaining her as...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Blanks in In-Camera Statements and Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) was violated as the in-camera statements contained blanks and the grounds of detention contained details not found in those statements.

30 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Ramuji Phatode, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives Renders Detention Unreasonable. Court held that the Detaining Authority must consider the possibility of resorting to less drastic measures like cancellation of bail or prosecution before ordering preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981.

27 Feb 2020

The petitioner, Rakesh Mohan Gadekar, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MPDA Detention Order Based on Severability of Grounds and Absence of Period in Initial Order. Detention Order Upheld as Past History Ground is Severable Under Section 5A, and Omission of Period in Initial Order Does Not Vitiate Detention.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioner, detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, challenged the detention order dated 22.08.2017 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Link Between Bootlegging and Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and establish a clear nexus between the alleged activities and public order, which was absent in this case.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anil Preetam Kumbhar, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune on 6 April 2018 under the Maharashtra Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Relied on Extraneous Material Including Inapplicable Sections. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Reliance on Irrelevant Documents Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

29 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Pawan Tukaram Kudale, challenged a detention order dated 29 January 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated by Casual Approach. Delay of 9 months between incident and detention order held to vitiate the subjective satisfaction under MPDA Act.

15 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Aalam Yosuf Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 15 September 2017 passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Under Section 3(2) Challenged for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Credible Material.

4 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Manoj @ Sonya S/o Ramdas Ghule, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226 of the Constitution of India and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Stale Grounds. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Old Incidents Without Proximate Link to Public Order.

16 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Adil Chaus, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad, on 30 August 2011 under Sect...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)