Search Results for "Karnataka Land Reforms Rules"

211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Order on Writ Petition Challenging Compromise Decree and Execution Proceedings — Fraud and Non-Alienation Clause Under Section 61 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Considered

The petitioners, judgment debtors in a compromise decree, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company's Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Title Not Established. Company failed to prove ownership of acquired lands, hence no locus standi to challenge awards under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.

The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Reforms Case Upholding High Court's Remand Order. Fraud in Obtaining Occupancy Rights Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Vitiates Proceedings, Justifying Remand for Fresh Disposal Despite Delay.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.1563 of 2007 connected with Writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Act Case — Restores Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights. Possession and Cultivation of Punja Land as on Appointed Date Sufficient to Establish Tenancy Under Sections 44 and 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's judgment that had set aside the Land Tribunal's order granting occupancy rights to the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Case — Restores Land Tribunal's Grant of Occupancy Rights Over Punja Land. The Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the Tribunal's findings of fact regarding possession and cultivation as on the appointed date.

The case involves a dispute over occupancy rights under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The appellant's predecessor, Bona Menezes, claimed tenan...