Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Reinstates Arbitral Award in Manning Agreement Dispute Over Vessel Grounding Penalty. Arbitrator Held to Have Jurisdiction to Interpret Contract and Invalidate Ouster Clause Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872, with Limited Judicial Review Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a Manning Agreement dated 26.12.2008 between appellant and the (respondent) for manning 17 vessels. On 06.07.2009, the ves...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Upholding Quashing of Award for Lack of Jurisdiction. The court affirmed that an arbitral award can be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for patent illegality when the arbitrator entertains a dispute without proof of membership under Section 84 of the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from an arbitration award passed in favor of Rajlaxmi Multistate Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. against respondents Smt. Ashwini An...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Case — Order Dismissing Section 47 Application Set Aside. Execution Court's Failure to Consider Objections Regarding Arbitral Award's Enforceability Constitutes Jurisdictional Error Under Section 115 CPC.

22 Mar 2024

The present Civil Revision Petition was filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 19.03.2022 passed by...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order Permitting Evidence in Arbitration Challenge. The Court held that the 2019 amendment to Section 34(2)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 is clarificatory and limits evidence to the arbitral record, disallowing additional evidence in Section 34 proceedings except in exceptional circumstances.

19 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from an arbitral award dated 12.03.1998, which was challenged by the respondents through an application under Section 34 of the Arbi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitrator Appointment Due to Unstamped Lease Deed. Insufficiently Stamped Document Cannot Be Acted Upon Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in MOU and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles applicant to seek court's intervention.

6 Dec 2013

The applicant, M/s. Hira Steel Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. The court held that the Section 9 application was within limitation and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Aug 2012

The appellant, M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd., entered into a contract dated 25.2.2008 with the respondent, M/s Balaji Logistics Carriers, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Substitute Arbitrator Despite Respondent's Objections to Validity of Arbitration Agreement. Finality of Section 11 Order Precludes Re-Agitation of Issues Regarding Existence of Arbitration Agreement and Limitation in Application for Substitute Arbitrator Under Section 15(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Aug 2010

The applicant filed an arbitration petition under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. By o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Against Arbitration Award as Time-Barred Under Article 119 of Limitation Act. Limitation period for setting aside award runs from date of notice of filing of award, not from date of receipt of award.

8 Dec 2005

The appeal arises from a judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing an arbitration petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporati...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)