Search Results for "Karnataka Apartments Ownership Act"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.

The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ESIC Complaint Against Director for Non-Payment of Contribution Under Section 85(A) of ESI Act — Complaint Filed Without Proper Sanction and Authorization. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Specific Averment of Role in Day-to-Day Management.

The petitioner, Mr. Naseer Ahmed, a director of M/s Bombay Rayon Fashions Limited-Unit 16, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheating and Forgery Case — Restores Magistrate's Order Issuing Process. Held that the Sessions Court erred in quashing process at the initial stage as there was a prima facie case under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 403 read with 120B IPC.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by the original complainant, Rajeev Sawhney, challenging an order dated 13.8.2008 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Possession Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy Before DRT Must Be Exhausted. Writ Petition Not Maintainable as SARFAESI Act Provides Complete Mechanism for Aggrieved Persons Under Section 17.

The petitioners, Dr. Anil Nandkishor Tibrewala and his wife, owned a flat in Mumbai. They had mortgaged the flat to Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. (respo...